[HCDX] International Broadcasters Know DCC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[HCDX] International Broadcasters Know DCC



Bundled radio news service : 
http://www.google.com/reader/bundle/user%2F06600224598981072865%2Fbundle%2Fradio
or 
http://goo.gl/Mgbqk

Visti my page : 
https://sites.google.com/site/zliangas/kaito-an200-antenna-review


International Broadcasters Know DCC
by Ernie Franke
on 10.12.2011
http://www.rwonline.com/article/international-broadcasters-know-dcc/24576

The author, WA2EWT, is a broadcast consultant in St. Petersburg, Fla.

The FCC has formally approved a "green" technique for AM radio stations that want to 
reduce their operating costs. The technique is known as Modulation Dependent Carrier 
Level, or MDCL. Public notice was issued on Sept. 13, extending what had been an 
experimental program in Alaska to all U.S. AM stations.

International broadcasters have been familiar with the concept for many years under the 
name of Dynamic Carrier Control. The purpose of this article is to explain to U.S. AM stations 
a technology already familiar to their colleagues abroad.

With escalating power bills, controlling electricity usage is especially important to the 
international broadcaster. Dynamic Carrier Control, offering significant savings in power bills 
for high-power broadcast transmitters, was proposed more than 75 years ago. It took the 
power of the integrated circuit digital signal processor (DSP) and pulse-step modulation 
(PSM) to bring it to fruition.
Power savings are impressive when DCC is added to 100, 250 and 500 kW transmitters.

Today, all modern super-power (output power greater than or equal to 100 kW) shortwave, 
and most medium-wave (AM band) transmitters, incorporate DCC capability. Total power 
consumption typically is reduced by 15 to 30 percent, and the effects are virtually 
undetectable to the listening audience.

As a benchmark, the average household in the U.S. consumes about 11,000 kilowatt-hours 
of electricity each year. Assuming an average power savings of 25 percent with DCC, a 
single modern 250 kW transmitter, operated 12 hours per day, saves 342,000 kilowatt-hours 
per year, or the equivalent of powering 30 average homes.

If we multiply this by the over 1,000 shortwave, super-power transmitters positioned around 
the world, we save enough electrical energy to power over 30,000 homes, a small city.
The AM modulator impresses the program onto the high-frequency radio wave.

BACKGROUND ON AMPLITUDE MODULATION

Amplitude modulation occurs when a voice or music signal´s varying voltage (fm) is applied to 
a carrier frequency (fC). The resultant AM signal consists of the carrier frequency, plus upper 
and lower sidebands, known as double sideband amplitude modulation (DSB-AM), more 
commonly referred to as plain AM.

When a carrier is amplitude-modulated, only one-third of the total RF power is contained in 
the information-bearing sidebands. The other two-thirds of the RF output power is contained 
in the carrier, which does not contribute to the transfer of information. The intelligence is in 
the sidebands, and the carrier is aptly named for its purpose of merely carrying the 
modulation.

With a complex modulating signal, such as voice or music, the sidebands generally contain 
only 20 to 25 percent of the overall signal power; thus the carrier consumes 75 to 80 percent 
of the total output power, making AM a very inefficient mode of transmission.

This raises the question: "How can the transmitted waveform be modified to reduce power 
without reducing received quality in simple AM receivers?"

WHAT DOES THE CARRIER DO FOR US?

The carrier in any AM system has two functions: to translate the information signal to a higher 
frequency that is suitable for transmission and to suppress static noise and interference 
during silent intervals in the program. When the amplitude of the audio signal is significantly 
less than that required for 100 percent modulation, it is possible to save on the power 
consumption of the transmitter by reducing the amplitude of the carrier, without affecting 
demodulation of the sidebands. Power savings of 15 to 30 percent (depending on program 
material) are feasible if carrier power is reduced 3 to 6 dB (carrier reduced one-half to one-
fourth) of the rated output power when modulation is low, with little or no effect on reception 
of the signal. DCC is designed to keep the carrier at sufficient amplitude to achieve 100 
percent modulation, even during the low-level portions of the audio program.

WHAT IS DCC?
The spectrum of AM signal shows the wasteful carrier power compared to the information-
bearing sideband power.

Traditionally, AM systems have provided a fixed carrier level and applied modulation up to 
100 percent (or +125 percent positive). Using DCC, during periods of low or no modulation, 
power consumption can be significantly lowered by automatically reducing the carrier level 
and restoring the carrier level when modulation later increases.

The transmitter is adjusted for full carrier power output when the audio input appears at 100 
percent modulation. If the audio input level falls, the carrier level will dynamically adjust itself 
to maintain modulation at 100 percent. If modulation is totally removed, the carrier level will 
fall to a pre-selected minimum level (-3 dB to -6 dB). Typically a front-panel switch or remote 
control offers selectable levels and types (different transfer curves) of DCC. With a typical 0.1 
ms attack and 200 ms release time, DCC retains the ability to modulate to positive 125 
percent as we do now. At +125 percent modulation, the carrier remains at the same level 
corresponding to 100 percent modulation.

ORIGIN OF DCC

This amplitude modulation energy-saving mode was devised in the late 1930s. DCC was not 
implemented in transmitter designs until the 1980s, because of the complexities of the 
control circuitry. If we journey back in time to the 1930s to the village of Gliesmarode in 
Germany, we find the first trace of DCC with Professor Pungs, who was involved in the 
development of broadcasting technology. His system was known as "HAPUG" 
Modulationsverfahren, incorporating the last name of each of the three inventors: Harbich, 
Pungs and Gerth. This system never made it beyond the experimental stage, due to a lack of 
computing and processing technology.

PULSE STEP MODULATION
The transfer function between the program audio and the actual level of the carrier has 
evolved to a curve that reduces the carrier power by a factor of four in the mid-volume range, 
but retains half-power at low audio moments.

The advent of PSM in the 1980s and DSPs in the 1990s allowed the implementation of DCC 
in all modern, high-power transmitters today. Using signal processing, we can readily break 
the modulation voltage waveform into a large number of steps. These small increments are 
used to turn a series of switches on or off. Thus modulation losses are now reduced to very 
low switching losses, increasing the efficiency of the modulator itself to better than 95 
percent.

The modulator typically consists of 48 series-connected modules, mimicking the sampling 
levels, which are switched into and out of operation to superimpose high-level audio onto the 
high-voltage DC anode (plate). The switching is accomplished with insulated gate bipolar 
transistors (IGBTs). A low-pass filter follows the series-connected modules, which removes 
the switching signals and allows the DC and audio signals to pass to the RF amplifier. To 
further refine the linearity, each power supply step is pulse-width modulated, creating a 
smooth transition from one step to the next.

PROGRAMMING TYPE AFFECTS POWER SAVINGS

As might be expected, actual power saving over that of non-DCC usage is highly affected by 
audio program content, with talk programs giving more power-saving than most music 
programming. Even the short blank spaces between spoken words allow the carrier to be 
reduced in conjunction with the decrease in modulation power.

Popular music programming dwells longer at modulation peaks, as evidenced by the higher 
degree of modulation index. Audio processing, which artificially increases the average level 
of modulation, tends to reduce power savings and increases the total power consumption. 
Tests using processed music programs consistently produced a power saving of 18 percent, 
whereas talk programs produced power-savings in excess of 22 percent.

DOES DCC AFFECT THE LISTENERS?

In AM transmission systems, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is largely determined by 
sideband power, not by carrier power. Thus, if an AM transmitter is modulated at 50 percent, 
a listener will have to turn the volume up 6 dB (x4) to get the same loudness as a transmitter 
modulated at 100 percent, consequently bringing up the background noise level by the same 
amount. If the carrier level of the same transmitter is lowered to obtain 100 percent 
modulation, no change in sideband power will occur. A receiver´s automatic gain control 
(AGC) circuitry will bring the volume up much as a volume control does, and background 
static noise will also increase by the same amount. Thus the SNR remains constant.
The advent of the digital signal processor (DSP) and the solid-state pulse-step modulator 
(PSM) have allowed DCC to emerge as a `green´ technology.

When folks seriously discuss the quality of the received signal over audio, they are most 
likely talking about local AM or FM, where small imperfections are readily noticed. The quality 
of audio over shortwave or international medium-wave is inherently low, due to atmospherics, 
fading and noise. Laboratory tests on subjective listening quality using DCC, even with co-
channel interference, showed no degradation.

Today, with so many Web-controlled, remote monitoring receivers, it is easy for a 
broadcaster to access their signal audio via the Internet. This allows the broadcaster to 
monitor their signal and make their own assessment of DCC under real-world propagation 
effects when transmitting to remote areas on shortwave. DCC tends to have little effect on 
listener perception because of slow receiver AGC. Experience has shown that when running 
a transmitter with DCC, response time is best set to fast attack/slow decay (0.1 ms attack / 
200 ms release) and carrier suppression, with no modulation, is set to -6 dB for first-hop 
targets and -3 dB for third-hop targets.

HOW DOES DCC AFFECT THE TRANSMITTER?

DCC extends the life of transmitter components because the transmitter operates below its 
design capability. One first notices that the power amplifier (PA) current meter now starts to 
wiggle with DCC energized. PA current will decrease with low-level audio as the carrier level 
is dynamically in accordance with the average modulation. Without DCC, the majority of PA 
current was needed just to produce the large constant-amplitude carrier power.

This variable power-line loading can cause audio modulation on the AC mains if the power 
lines are exceptionally long to the broadcast station. This is especially true at large 
transmitting centers, where two or more transmitters are simultaneously broadcasting over 
different bands, but using the same audio program. When powered by diesel generators, 
feedback control circuitry in the generators must be modified to handle these increased load 
swings on the AC power line.

WHO OFFERS DCC?

DCC´s effectiveness and acceptance by broadcasters is indicated by the fact that all of the 
super-power shortwave transmitter manufacturers - Continental Electronics in Dallas, RIZ-
Transmitters in Croatia, Thomson Broadcast & Multimedia in Switzerland and Nautel in 
U.S./Canada - offer it as built-in or optional. Nautel has long offered DCC on its NX series 
of high-power medium-wave models. Harris Corp. offers DCC in its line of high-power AM 
transmitters.

The addition of DCC can pay for itself in as little as a few months, based on the broadcast 
power level and the price of oil. Transmitters more than 30 years old evidenced an overall 
efficiency of only 70 percent. With the use of switch-mode Class D and pulse-step 
modulation, the overall (AC power-to-RF power) efficiency has improved to nearly 80 percent 
for high-power shortwave and nearly 90 percent for high-power medium-wave transmitters.

FOLLOW THE MONEY TRAIL

DCC´s appearance can be linked to NATO nations trying to save energy as a result of the 
ripple effects of OPEC-related oil supply crises. Eastern European manufacturers of 
shortwave transmitters never adopted DCC because Russia, in particular, had no energy 
crises due to its abundant supply of oil.

International broadcasters are indeed interested in "going green," and even more so in the 
future as power bills continue to esculate. Not only do all the manufacturers of high-power 
transmitters offer DCC, but all the broadcasters use it to help contain expenses. DCC was 
pioneered by the broadcasting giant British Broadcasting Corp. (BBC) and AEG Telefunken 
in the late 1980s.

As the cost of electricity steadily increased, others such as Voice of America (VOA), Trans 
World Radio (TWR), HCJB (Voice of the Andes), Radio France Internationale (RFI), 
Deutsche Welle (DW), Radio Canada International (RCI), Far East Broadcasting Co. (FEBC), 
Australian Broadcasting Corp. (ABC Radio Australia), Radio New Zealand (RNZ) and Radio 
Netherlands Worldwide (RNW) quickly joined the fray. As a simple matter of economics, it is 
to be expected other broadcasters will add to the numbers, as they are able to make the 
switch.

In April 2011, the FCC authorized the use of DCC on non-commercial AM stations in Alaska 
as long as notification was given to the commission. The high cost of electricity in the state 
was a factor in the decision to allow stations to use DCC experimentally.Power reductions of 
30 to 35 percent were reported, with no deterioration of received sound and no complaints 
about reception from listeners.

The experimental operation appears to have been a success, confirmed by the recent FCC 
action to allow DCC for all U.S. AM stations.

Comment on this or any other story to rwee@xxxxxxxxxxx @Standard rig : ICOM R75 / 
2x16 V / m@h40 heads Sennheiser 
Please read and distribute this 15 year research article http://tinyurl.com/5vzg7e 
Please read my article on SINPO at http://tinyurl.com/yt7qjd
________________________
http://zlgr.multiply.com (radio monitoring site plus audio clips ) MAIN SITE 
http://www.delicious.com/gr_greek1/@zach (all mypages !!)
........
Zacharias Liangas , Thessaloniki Greece 
greekdx @ otenet dot gr  ---  
Pesawat penerima: ICOM R75 , Lowe HF150 , Degen 1102,1103,108,
Tecsun PL200/550, Chibo c300/c979, Yupi 7000 
Antenna: 16m hor, 2x16 m V invert, 1m australian loop 


---[Start Commercial]---------------------

Order your WRTH 2011:
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/redirect2.php?id=wrth2011
---[End Commercial]-----------------------
________________________________________
Hard-Core-DX mailing list
Hard-Core-DX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/hard-core-dx
http://www.hard-core-dx.com/
_______________________________________________

THE INFORMATION IN THIS ARTICLE IS FREE. It may be copied, distributed
and/or modified under the conditions set down in the Design Science License
published by Michael Stutz at
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/dsl.html