[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] 9/30/16 DU chase from IL
To finish up on this topic (for now?) Tim...I 
asked on the MWoffsets list about these, 
and  Merv Joyce in Australia has responded with 
this follow up information, if you don't already have it:
2NR checked on ground-wave here in Brisbane at 
0200-0230Z.  Nicely cycling 738.0019  738.0022 
with an approx. 5 minute period.
I have checked those other two signals on 738kHz 
you mentioned the other day ... they are both 
visible at local sunset and fade-out time as 
noted here would confirm that (consistent with the sunrise vector)
738.0007 is indeed Tahiti
737.9985 is NZL (but this signal varies between 
998 and 000 during any night  moving higher in frequency as night progresses)
Merv has a very professional approach to nailing 
these offsets down, so I'd defer to him myself on 
this topic.    (which means I was very gratified 
to see his verification of my Tahiti measurement!)
best wishes,
Nick
*********************************************
Hi Tim,
Checked again this morning after a fresh 
calibration, and I have 2NR on 738.0018 and 
Tahiti on 738.0007, so agreeing very well with what you saw.
Thanks for getting me to think about this 
again.   Got to get that GPS lock set up; I've 
only been thinking about it for the last 4 years.
best wishes,
Nick
At 18:41 01-10-16, you wrote:
Thanks Nick.  After freshly calibrating this morning, I noted three
standouts here: 737.998, 738.001 & 737.002 and I suspected the last two
(also the strongest) were 2NR & Tahiti.  Both were producing a bit of audio
again here this morning.  The .998 is the one that got my attention and it
wasn't far behind Tahiti in carrier strength.
73,
-Tim
Nick Hall-Patch
Victoria, BC
Canada  
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx