Re: [IRCA] Another Chinese Wave at 1320

[Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>]

Just checked my recording, and similar levels on 639 at 1452 and 
1456UT, using a Flag antenna mind you with a beefy SDR.    But then I 
tell myself this is a poorer place for Asian reception.

I suspect tomorrow may not be quite so good, so enjoy what we recorded.

best wishes,

Nick


At 15:37 2018-02-15, Gary DeBock wrote:
> Hi Todd,
>
> The Chinese wave did indeed hit the west coast during sunrise 
> enhancement this morning, with exceptional signals from 603-China 
> (Hulun Buir?), 639-CNR1 and others. Here was 639-CNR1 at an S9 level 
> at 1454 UTC this morning 
> https://dreamcrafts.box.com/s/dn8h4sbwco01mvyasa1859d0eiv1q8vh
>
> 73, Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
> 7.5" CC Skywave Ultralight (base model) +
> 15" FSL antenna
>
>
> > On February 15, 2018 at 6:26 AM Forrester S <amradio1976@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >     On my way in to work this morning around 4AM I was hearing a 
> het against 970 with it most likely being Korea. Also in which is 
> very very rare at night was KCFO Tulsa. Much more common at SSS. 
> This all with the car radio.
> >
> >     Todd Skaine
> >     ICOM 7300 wth a Superloop
> >     2 Modified 2010s barefoot
> >     Toyota car radio
> >
> >     On Feb 15, 2018 7:39 AM, "Gary DeBock" <d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> mailto:d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:
> >
> >         > > 603-China was at a pretty exceptional level (S7) way 
> over HLSA at 1320, and 657-China was in a mix with Pyongyang as 
> early as 1215. Don't want to jinx things, but sunrise enhancement 
> could bring some serious fun if these kind of signals hold up.
> > >
> > >
> > >         Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
> > >
> > >         _______________________________________________
> > >         IRCA mailing list
> > >         IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailto:IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >         http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > >
> > >         Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are 
> those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect 
> the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > >
> > >         For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > >
> > >         To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> mailto:irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > >     >
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Nick Hall-Patch
Victoria, BC
Canada 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx