Re: [IRCA] WKVQ Test

[Mike Sanburn <mikesanburn@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Great catch Pat--'wish I would have tried for it now.  ms

> From: mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 10:19:00 -0800
> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: am@xxxxxxxxxxx; irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] WKVQ Test
> 
> Yes, it was a great fun DX Test. I was surprised the difference between
> the 0100 and the 0200 tests. I could barely get the morse code during
> the first test. It was there, but I was wondering if I could get a QSL
> out of it, as copying the code was impossible, it was so weak,  plus
> even hearing it with a trained ear wasn't easy. But fortunately, by
> 0200, the cx changed where WKVQ was topping the frequency! Code was easy
> to copy and even voice IDs and identifiing the music sellections was
> easy. It seemed like they boosted from 250w to 50 KW within that period!
> Infact I even called Craig back to find out if he had changed anything.
> He hadn't. He ran 10 KW ND both tests.  Wow what a test. Thanks so much.
> Another GA station! A QSL reqest is going out today with a CD.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Patrick
> 
> Patrick Martin
> Seaside OR 
> KGED QSL Manager
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx