Re: [IRCA] X-BAND ODDITIES (wasRe: More Loggings)

[neilkaz <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

KHPY 1670 has a 3 tower direction pattern to the SW at night and as a result is very rare here in the midwest.

http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/amq?list=0&facid=87156 shows a 3 tower array,

73 KAZ

-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Durenberger <Mark4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Jul 26, 2014 8:53 AM
>To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [IRCA] X-BAND ODDITIES (wasRe:  More Loggings)
>
>The Expanded Band was indeed set up for 10 kilowatts day, 1 kilowatt 
>night...NON-directional.  But a few stations vary from this architecture:
>
>KDIA Vallejo CA 1640 is authorized 10 kilowatts night, directional SW.
>
>KZLZ Enid OK 1640 operates a 1 kilowatt peanut pattern NW/SE.
>
>KFOX Torrance CA 1650 is authorized 490 watts nighttime.
>
>KSVE El Paso TX 1650 is power-limited day and night
>
>WWRU Jersey City NJ 1660 is 10 kilowatts  full-time directional.
>
>KHPY Moreno Valley CA 1670 is 9 kilowatts night non-directional.
>
>WPRR Ada MI 1680 is limited to 680 watts at night.
>
>WIGT Charlotte Amalie VI 1690 is 920 watts full-time.
>
>KVNS Brownsville TX 1700 is power-limited.
>
>WRCR Stony Point NY 1700 is directional at night.
>
>The Canadians are starting to show up all over the X-band with varying power 
>levels; a few 10 kilowatts full-time.
>
>Cheers!
>
>Mark Durenberger
>
>
>-----Original Message----- 
>From: Mike Sanburn
>Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 8:05 AM
>To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] More Loggings
>
>I believe the standard for the X-band stations is (or was) 
>10kw/1kw......Sure seems that portion of the band got really crowded in 
>California and Northern Mexico. 'Doesn't seem like so many years ago that 
>DXers here on the West coast were easily able to log Iowa on 1630, New 
>Jersey on 1660, Florida on 1700....ms
>
>> From: wb6tnb@xxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 07:39:20 -0500
>> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] More Loggings
>>
>> Spanish language XEUT in Tijuana Northern Baja California is on 1630. It 
>> gets out very well.
>>
>> A number of sources show the power as 10 kW day and 1 kW night both 
>> nondirectional. However in Mexico it is not unusual for stations to run 
>> more power and use different patterns than they are licensed for.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On Jul 25, 2014, at 11:36 PM, "Paul B. Walker, Jr." 
>> > <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > This is my first real time doing a night time scan of the AM dial since 
>> > I
>> > moved to Redding, CA. Well, my first time using batteries in my radio..
>> > sitting outside.. away from the house and not plugged into wall power.
>> >
>> > Hearing oldies on 1380 again for the second night in a row, same 
>> > station..
>> > and they're using the Instant Radio Station on CD jingles from the late 
>> > Ben
>> > Freedman.. all I ever hear them ID as is "Oldies 1380". I suspect KSRV
>> > Ontario, Oregon.
>> >
>> > Hearing country and talk on 1420..the country station isn't KMHS Coos 
>> > Bay,
>> > Oregon...checked against their webstream and the songs didn't match.
>> >
>> > Hearing a 1630 in Spanish ....they're playing music but it's not all
>> > Spanish music. The promos and liners are in Spanish but not all the 
>> > music
>> > is. I heard a mention of "Baja"..it's not 1630 from "Fox Farm" Wyoming.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > IRCA mailing list
>> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> >
>> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
>> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> >
>> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> >
>> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
>IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx