I also had trace audio on 1611 bothered by a stronger than normal for
sunrise Toronto. 1629 was close to audio as was 1512. Weaker but quite
present were 1683 and the station on the high side of 1701. 1665 and a few
other decent carriers also noted.
You may want to listen to 1550 if you need KMRI from Utah. SS mx and the
gal gives a 3 station ID at about 1158:30 UTC. She ment 1660 Brigham
City but I thought they were gone? The tail end of KICS/KXPN ID was noted
at 1200 on 1550.
Things were hopping on the upper band with 1680 KNTS nice with SS rlg mx
and both Californians on 1670 noted u/WOZN.
73 KAZ Barrington IL
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Tim Tromp firstname.lastname@example.org [ABDX] <
> Nice going, Kaz, congrats! Yesterday morning was better here with less
> slop from adjacent KXEL. I was able to dig out some short bursts of Aussie
> accented audio under the splatter this morning just prior to 1200 UTC. By
> 1208 UTC, it was gone, carrier and all...
> Tim Tromp
> West Michigan
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Neil Kazaross <email@example.com>
>> Noting that Tim Tromp in MI has had them twice in a week and has caught
>> them in March in the past couple of years, I had to try this morning.
>> Previous attempts at getting them have resulted in carriers in too much
>> slop for audio.
>> I got to the rx this morning a minute prior to my 1154 UT SR. Bingo,
>> there's a big carrier on 1548.01 in much slop and sure enough I can hear
>> Aussie accented guy speaking. The signal fades up and down lots and I
>> around and note quite a few other highband carriers.
>> 1548 was fading down somewhat by ToH but the ABC nx sounder mx was clear
>> A quick check of low band Aussie freqs showed about no trace. I'll see if
>> any Asians came thru when I get home. Japan and Korea seem to not get east
>> of cental OK unless cx are extraordinary.
>> 73 KAZ Barrington IL Perseus and DKAZ at 330 deg
>> IRCA mailing list
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> To Post a message: firstname.lastname@example.org