[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] South Korean MW Jamming



Correct, all the jammers (except the video game one, which is 819's short off-air period between daily sign-off and the dead air/tone before sign-on) are South Korea. I'll post the North Korean ones perhaps tomorrow.
The 1053 jammers are complicated, as is that whole busy frequency - the 
busiest, by far, in Seoul. The main two are Seoul and Gimpo. The Seoul one 
is the one everyone always hears overseas, but it doesn't get out well 
locally. I'm not sure if it's directional, but I'm going to guess not. The 
tower site has 19 towers, whereas the Gimpo site is 4 large towers in a 
line, exactly similar to the site in Jeju-do. The 1053 siren jammer is on 16 
1/2 hours a day with very clear on/off times. The Seoul jammer had been 24/7 
for the longest time, but lately has been turning off. It turned off tonight 
at 11:19pm local (1419 UTC) leaving Shenyang and Yanbian to fight it out, 
but I'm hearing one of the new Hwaseong jammers in the distance, though not 
from there. A few jamming sites have gone online in the past two weeks 
across the country. I try to stick to Seoul, which my publication covers, 
and ignore the other areas or else I'd go insane.
The Gimpo jammer, while I have no absolute proof of it (they don't share 
this information, obviously) is aiming south. Why? The purpose of jammers 
isn't to defeat the signal they're up against. You don't aim *at* the signal 
you're jamming. AM radio - even FM - doesn't work like that. So aiming it 
northwest would be a futile effort against a 1,500kw powerhouse. 1053 Haeju 
clocks in at 75-80dBu at my DX site in Incheon, 61 miles from its tower. 
Clear water path does damage. There is no defeating that signal and it's a 
ridiculous attempt to hope to. So the point of the jammers is to cover the 
signal by any means necessary to the majority of the population. 50% of the 
nation's population - 26 of 51 million - live in the Seoul metro area. The 
aforementioned main Seoul site does a half-decent job at covering the most 
densely populated area. On the east side of the city, the Taereung 
experimental site fills in a few areas if necessary. The Hwaseong jammer 
site (which went full power on 11/21 after a year-plus of testing) is now 
taking care of the south and far south suburbs. The purpose of the Gimpo 
siren jammer is to cover Incheon. Incheon is a major city that is connected 
to and is part of the Seoul metro area and it's a coastal city. 1053 with 
that open water path really blasts into there and that jammer has a wider 
and louder signal that really is catered to the coastal areas. Gimpo is 
along the border, so if you want to cover the Korean population, the only 
way to aim is south (the other jammer is 16 miles to the east, so no reason 
to aim in the direction of Seoul, which is already covered). Furthermore, 
the tower site is just barely in Gimpo a short distance from the sea; 
basically it's right beside Incheon itself. And if I'm right, once upon a 
time, the site was *on* the sea. Incheon has been reclaiming land like mad 
over the years, so the coastline extends further and further out.
I'm not sure about 1566 and rebroadcasting audio. It may be another 
phenomenon, though things change year by year in the area. 1566 is a 
horrible frequency in Seoul. It's nearly impossible to get a clear signal on 
FEBC Jeju. There is a ridiculous amount of interference from Yanbian and the 
Pyongyang jammer (//1467 siren jammer which also decimates that frequency) 
really makes things muddy. Of course, I'll post that jammer with the rest of 
the North Korean ones soon. In 2015, I could get a very strong Jeju signal, 
but something changed by 2016; I think Pyongyang increased its power.
-Chris Kadlec
Seoul AM Listening Guide


Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:03:04 +0000
From: Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [IRCA] South Korean MW Jamming
Message-ID: <6a5233e9b2078ad2306b3735bf254b20@mtlp000085>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed


Thanks for doing this Chris.   The subtleties are endless.

Couple of questions.   These are all originating  in South Korea, is
that correct?  (except for video games on 819?)
\\

further:
This is the Gimpo siren jammer, THE most powerful jammer in Korea at
250kw, aimed south and on 16 1/2 hours a day, yet still stupidly
leaving a full hour a day unjammed. While it's the most heard in the
country, the dinky Seoul jammer 16 miles away is the one that gets
out across the entire globe but can barely cover a 50-mile radius in
Korea. We suspect its power is going up to the sky (or due north) as
opposed to covering the ground as it should be.
Gimpo being in South Korea, what is it jamming from the
south?  (which might be why we don't hear it on northerly
paths?)    This siren is what I heard on 1053 years ago, have a
recording from 2007; the recordings from 2008 are without sirens.  I
don't think I've heard the sirens since then.





This one is used at tourist sites along the DMZ. This is recorded
less than 10 miles from the tower of 50kw 810 KCBS while standing
beside the North Korean customs booth a half mile from the actual
border, but a 60dBu silent signal very closeby is muffling it. These
are mounted on little sticks on the side of buildings like 10-watt
transmitters.


I've heard something like this earlier this year on 1566.   They're
taking the audio of the originating station, distorting somehow and
rebroadcasting?

best wishes,

Nick

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx