Mark,
Was wondering about the high noise level. Would you have an opinion on 
it's origin?
Alex
________________________________
From: Mark D Mobile <Mark4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: MDXC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Putrich Greg <gregp@xxxxxxxxx>; DX-IRCA 
<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "DX @NRC" <am@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2012 5:23 PM
Subject: [IRCA] Beverage Antenna in Utah Part Two
REPORT 2:   We concluded our work on Monday 5/7 and 'struck the set'. 
SDR recordings had been made over several evenings on both the elevated 
Beverage and the BOG (1800 feet).  Mike's suggested antenna azimuth was 
validated by the high number of stations received in the corridor: 
Eastern Washington--Western Montana.  I'll post the catch-list later as 
we look for the unlikely Alaska catches.  I say unlikely BECAUSE:
In addition to the weather issues we encountered an abnormally high 
noise level throughout the weekend.  With the bandwidth we used (6 khz), 
the SDRs were displaying noise around -75 to -80 dbm.  (I'm used to 
Beverage noise floors below -110.)  This was one difficulty we just 
couldn't overcome.  The noise (certainly QRN) was broadband and 
continuous, as opposed to the spiky stuff you hear when it's primarily 
atmospherics.
Other measurements involved switching an SDR between the elevated Bev 
and the BOG and recording signal levels; both broadband and narrowband. 
These results and other data will be published later.  To be determined 
on further playback is whether the BOG was performing as an 
electrically-longer antenna than the elevated...on this very dry desert 
floor.
On one occasion when we lit up in daytime we heard a rhythmic 
interference spike several db above that dreaded broadband noise.  Of 
interest is that this noise was greatly reduced when we switched from 
the elevated to the BOG.
The single-wire remote beverage terminator worked very well, as noted 
earlier.
Further Facts Follow From us Fools in the Field.
Mark Durenberger
On the road
From: Mark D Mobile
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2012 11:22 AM
.REPORT 1:
My friend Mike and I set up two 1800-foot Beverages in the Eastern Utah
desert...one is a BOG and the other elevated about 3 feet.  Beverages 
are at
320 degrees; we're looking for Alaska.   Counterpoises on the ends are 
four
300-foot radials of copper supplemented by ground rods.
The new single-wire remote termination control has proved a great 
success.
Even though the DC resistance on our dry-desert-earth path measures 
close to
2 megohms (!) the 'current amplifier' works well and drives a Vactrol 
for
ideal termination.  (Of course "ideal" is only for one frequency but the 
SDR
does a nice job of showing the overall front-to-back changes.)
We already know that it's working...those of you who've been in this 
area
know how tough it can be to remove KOB 770 in favor of KTTH, and KOKC in
favor of KKXA, without phasing...using only the F-B termination.
Today's work will include measurements (with two SDRs) comparing the
elevated Beverage and the BOG, logging RF levels across the MW band in
various conditions of connectivity.  Of particular interest is what we 
learn
when the BOG (running directly under the elevated wire) is used as a
counterpoise.  Audio reports will appear on DXAS.
The weather has been semi-adverse.  Nice temps...but strong winds have 
meant
DUST!  Today however appears a bit more benign.
We hope to share today's results in the next report.
Mark Durenberger
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx