[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] State of the art SDR (Perseus, etc)
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] State of the art SDR (Perseus, etc)
- From: Mauno Ritola <Mauno.Ritola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:40:44 +0200
24.11.2012 20:24, Nick Hall-Patch kirjoitti:
That's definitely another point in favor of the Perseus, Chuck.  Does 
Studio One address the unattended recording reliability problems that 
Perseus had/has in its native software? 
I record a lot unattended and I may see one or two failures per season. 
I don't know what has improved, but I think I had them a bit more before.
The Afedri has been tested by top notch MW DXer Bjarne Mjelde and he 
is quite satisfied. As it has less dynamic range that the Perseus, I 
expect someone with some antenna will sooner or later see a small 
problem. But with a delivered price tag of around $250 I think it 
will gain an audience.
Tracey Gardner suggested using this filter with it:
http://217.34.103.131/pdfs/BLP-2.5+.pdf
73, Mauno
Chuck
On 11/24/2012 7:45 AM, Nick Hall-Patch wrote:
I would think that the Perseus has the largest user base, Les, and 
as Neil mentioned, there is other software, though Studio 1 has a 
price tag (successor to WRPlus with which I believe you have some 
experience) .
I hope some of the Excalibur users check in.   I haven't DXed with 
it, but was quite impressed with its software interface when Bruce 
Conti showed it to me, and I believe it is the least expensive of 
the "full MW band" SDRs.    Mind you, the inability to record large 
bandwidth without using a workaround or paying extra could be a deal 
breaker, and so far, if you don't like the vendor's software, I'm 
not sure there is any alternative.
As a caveat to the "least expensive" above, there is the Afedri 
SDR-net http://4z5lv.net/index.php/afedri-sdr-net-description, 
1200kHz bandwidth, but I think you would be breaking new ground for 
the MW DXer; they claim you can drive it with SDR-radio software.    
I'd be tempted to try it, especially if I travelled more; maybe next 
year.
My own experience is with RFSpace, but I suspect the NetSDR's 
premium price is justified only for those with instrumentation 
interests, are looking for the potential for two different radios in 
one box (developed but not yet sold; but try listening to a 
shortwave parallel for a MW TP on any other SDR)  and/or who like 
the idea of being provided with example software that they can 
modify for their own use.    It will be interesting to see how the 
imminent version 2 of SDR-console flies.    Free, continually 
upgraded software, but version 1.5 never quite addressed some of my 
concerns as a DXer, which surprisingly, Spectravue did.
best wishes,
Nick
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx