Re: [IRCA] 1120 Yelm Wa

[Scott Fybush <scott@xxxxxxxxxx>]

bill kral wrote:
> To all of you who commented on the 1120 Yelm story. How did they come
> up with 1120 as a viable freq if all of you agree on the fact that
> they will be swallowed up by a 50 grander only ,(I don't know,I
> haven't checked a map yet) less than 200 kliks away.I have been
> getting KPNW with a fair signal here in Vic BC at 3:30 PM everyday
> for 6 months so after dark it will be useless. 1140 looks a lot
> better as it is vacant in OR and WA with the nearest occupant in
> Boise . I don't know if 6K would cause problems for the 1150s in
> Pullman and Seattle. Anyone with a yea or a nay.Bill in BC

1140 would certainly have been better at night - but it would have been 
too close to 1150 in Seattle for daytime use. For adjacent-channel class 
B stations, the 0.25 mV/m of the proposed station can't overlap the 0.5 
mV/m contour of the existing station, and the 0.5 of the proposed 
station can't overlap the 0.25 mV/m contour of the existing station. The 
0.25 mV/m contour of the Seattle 1150 covers all of Yelm.

1120 may be a lousy frequency, but it was all that was available.

s



_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx